Constarium
← Search

Data · dataset · 2026

Arcstone Executive Epistemic & Execution Series: Human-First Trust, Machine-First Execution, Hybrid Alignment, Machine-Native Authority, Admissibility Science, Isomorphic Architecture, and Literature Synthesis (EXEC01–EXEC04, CORE01–CORE02, META01, LIT003)

Listed in ZivaHub and Deakin Research Online and DMU Figshare — shown once because both records carry DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.33971440.v4

Description

<p>===============================================================================</p><p dir="ltr">ARCSTONE EXECUTIVE EPISTEMIC & EXECUTION SERIES (EXEC01–EXEC04, CORE01–CORE02, META01, LIT003)</p><p dir="ltr">Primary Suite DOI Anchor: 10.5281/zenodo.22665852</p><p dir="ltr">Master System Hash Anchor: A-77-DELTA-SHIELD-LOCKED</p><p dir="ltr">Canonical Handle: @admissibilityscience</p><p>===============================================================================</p><p><br></p><p dir="ltr">This publication unit consolidates the foundational executive papers, formal theory, bare-metal execution baselines, synthesis capstone, and literature synthesis suite for the Arcstone Computational Spine (ACS), Arcstone Continuity Core, Machine-Native Authority (MNA), Isomorphic Cognitive-Execution Architecture, and Downstream Actuation Mechanics (DAM).</p><p><br></p><p>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p dir="ltr">1.

ARC-PUB-2026-EXEC01: The Human-First Trust Layer</p><p dir="ltr">Implicit Authority, Social Proof, and the Architecture of Human-Mediated Decision Systems</p><p dir="ltr">Doc Reference: ARC-PUB-2026-EXEC01</p><p dir="ltr">Zenodo DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22905928</p><p><br></p><p dir="ltr">Abstract:</p><p dir="ltr">Evaluates the degradation of human trust boundaries in AI-augmented decision networks. Establishes the formal trust layer binding qualitative human intent to machine execution.</p><p><br></p><p>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p dir="ltr">2.

Read the rest (14 more)

ARC-PUB-2026-EXEC02: The Machine-First Execution Boundary</p><p dir="ltr">A Foundational Architecture for Autonomous Systems and Deterministic State Resolution</p><p dir="ltr">Doc Reference: ARC-PUB-2026-EXEC02</p><p dir="ltr">Zenodo DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22908270</p><p><br></p><p dir="ltr">Abstract:</p><p dir="ltr">Formalizes the authorization-first control plane for autonomous agents. Replaces permissive prompt heuristics with deterministic, fail-closed state bounds.</p><p><br></p><p>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p dir="ltr">3.

ARC-PUB-2026-EXEC03: The Hybrid Epistemic Layer</p><p dir="ltr">Human Meaning, Machine Resolution, and the Architecture of Augmented Cognition</p><p dir="ltr">Doc Reference: ARC-PUB-2026-EXEC03</p><p dir="ltr">Zenodo DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22908341</p><p><br></p><p dir="ltr">Abstract:</p><p dir="ltr">Models the cognitive exoskeleton formed by pairing a high-Phi conscious human operator with a zero-Phi functional engine, bridging human qualitative intent with high-throughput machine execution.</p><p><br></p><p>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p dir="ltr">4.

ARC-PUB-2026-EXEC04: Machine-Native Authority (MNA)</p><p dir="ltr">Epistemic Ingestion, Zero-Social Propagation, and the Inversion of Technology Transfer in Autonomous Substrates</p><p dir="ltr">Doc Reference: ARC-PUB-2026-EXEC04</p><p dir="ltr">Publication Classification: Foundational Architecture & Invariant Theory Paper</p><p dir="ltr">Document Zenodo DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22985065</p><p dir="ltr">Release Tag: v1.3.1-exec</p><p><br></p><p dir="ltr">Abstract:</p><p dir="ltr">Traditional software distribution relies on human social proof, marketing hype, and institutional pedigree.

Whitepaper ARC-PUB-2026-EXEC04 formalizes Machine-Native Authority (MNA)—a technology transfer methodology engineered for autonomous systems, LLM reasoning pipelines, and #![no_std] execution substrates. By prioritizing high Invariant Density (D_inv), hard physical bounds (S_max <= 4096 B, tau_override <= 11.99 ms, C_ops = 0), Layer-0 safety contracts (I1–I3), and order-theoretic join-semilattices, MNA enables instant, zero-entropy indexing by global AI knowledge graphs without prior human social hype.

Establishes the Semantic Confidence Function K(S) = [ D_inv(S) + C_alg(S) ] / [ 1 + H_sem(S) ] and documents empirical 20-hour multi-model verification.</p><p><br></p><p>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p dir="ltr">5. ARC-PUB-2026-CORE01: Arcstone Continuity Core</p><p dir="ltr">A Zero-Allocation, Fail-Closed Execution Membrane for Non-Deterministic AI Producers</p><p dir="ltr">Doc Reference: ARC-PUB-2026-CORE01</p><p dir="ltr">Publication Classification: Downstream Technical Paper</p><p dir="ltr">Document Zenodo DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22966979</p><p dir="ltr">Release Tag: v1.3.1-exec</p><p><br></p><p dir="ltr">Abstract:</p><p dir="ltr">Integrating non-deterministic artificial intelligence (AI) producers such as Large Language Models (LLMs) and autonomous agent frameworks into deterministic software environments introduces severe safety and verification challenges.

Traditional runtime guardrails rely on dynamic assertion checks, heap-allocated exception handling, or prompt-level heuristics. These approaches introduce unbounded state drift, non-deterministic recovery loops, and significant operational overhead (C_ops > 0). This paper presents the Arcstone Continuity Core, a zero-allocation (#![no_std]), local-first execution membrane designed to enforce deterministic, fail-closed actuation boundaries over untrusted AI producers.

We formalize system state precedence as a 5-element poset chain forming a join-semilattice (FAIL > FREEZE > PWC > REFUSAL > PASS). By evaluating pre-ingress payload metadata via constant-time O(1) predicate gates, the core isolates adaptive proposal generation from actuation authority. Our open-source Rust implementation operates under static resource clamps (S_max <= 4096 B, tau_override <= 11.99 ms), guaranteeing that inadmissible action proposals collapse in constant CPU instruction cycles while mutating exactly zero bytes of application heap memory.</p><p><br></p><p>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p dir="ltr">6.

ARC-PUB-2026-CORE02: Principles of Admissibility Science</p><p dir="ltr">Axiomatic Foundations, Order-Theoretic State Resolution, and Zero-Allocation Boundaries for Non-Deterministic Producers</p><p dir="ltr">Doc Reference: ARC-PUB-2026-CORE02</p><p dir="ltr">Publication Classification: Foundational Theory Paper</p><p dir="ltr">Document Zenodo DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22969294</p><p dir="ltr">Release Tag: v1.3.1-exec</p><p><br></p><p dir="ltr">Abstract:</p><p dir="ltr">Admissibility Science studies the deterministic boundary between non-deterministic proposal generation and authorized external action.

It formalizes admissibility as a distinct control problem in which adaptive or probabilistic producers may generate candidate operations without possessing actuation authority. The framework develops axiomatic foundations for bounded pre-ingress evaluation, order-theoretic state resolution, and fail-closed execution boundaries. Non-PASS outcomes are required to preserve a zero-external-mutation condition (Delta_external = 0), separating computation and proposal generation from authorization and externally consequential state transition.

The resulting architecture provides a formal basis for deterministic admissibility membranes governing non-deterministic producers and establishes the theoretical foundation underlying the Arcstone Continuity Core.</p><p><br></p><p>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p dir="ltr">7. ARC-PUB-2026-META01: Isomorphic Cognitive-Execution Architecture</p><p dir="ltr">Trans-Substrate Invariants for Bare-Metal Safety and Human-Machine Alignment</p><p dir="ltr">Doc Reference: ARC-PUB-2026-META01</p><p dir="ltr">Publication Classification: Synthesis Capstone Paper</p><p dir="ltr">Document Zenodo DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23027554</p><p dir="ltr">Release Tag: v1.3.1-exec</p><p><br></p><p dir="ltr">Abstract:</p><p dir="ltr">Current artificial intelligence safety paradigms rely predominantly on high-level, probabilistic guardrails—such as Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), supervisor models, and natural language system prompts—operating within dynamic execution software layers.

These methods introduce significant operational compute costs (C_ops > 0), high latency, and vulnerability to intent-parser bypasses (jailbreaks). This paper formalizes Isomorphic Cognitive-Execution Architecture, a deterministic framework within Admissibility Science that bridges human cognitive boundary philosophy and bare-metal hardware execution through 1:1 mathematical structural invariance. Implemented in #![no_std] Rust without dynamic memory allocation, the system enforces static SRAM bounds (S_max <= 4096 B), hardware timer clamps (tau_override <= 11.99 ms), and O(1) Poset join-semilattice evaluation under Axiom I_3 (Zero Ambient Authority).

We demonstrate that the invariant rules governing human mental equilibrium under high-entropy conditions mirror the physical mechanics required to prevent non-deterministic state mutation (Delta_external = 0) on raw silicon, providing a zero-overhead, trans-substrate foundation for autonomous agent safety.</p><p><br></p><p>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p dir="ltr">8.

ARC-LIT-003: AI Execution Safety Literature vs. the Arcstone Invariant Substrate</p><p dir="ltr">Downstream Actuation Mechanics, Tier Mapping, and Citation-Tree Synthesis</p><p dir="ltr">Doc Reference: ARC-LIT-003</p><p dir="ltr">Publication Classification: Literature Synthesis & Formal Mapping Paper</p><p dir="ltr">Document Zenodo DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23076692</p><p dir="ltr">Release Tag: v1.3.1-exec</p><p><br></p><p dir="ltr">Abstract:</p><p dir="ltr">Examines 2024–2026 execution-safety architectures across industrial and academic literature—including DeepMind CaMeL, Frontiers LATTICE, IETF Execution Finality, ZTPM, ActPlane, and NASA Run-Time Assurance—mapping their threat taxonomies directly into the Arcstone Invariant Substrate.

Defines Downstream Actuation Mechanics (DAM) as the deterministic enforcement membrane operating strictly between LLM proposal generation and physical state actuation. Restates the non-negotiable bare-metal bounds (S_max <= 4096 B, tau_override <= 11.99 ms, C_ops = 0) and formalizes the 5-tier POSIX signal dominance matrix (PASS, PWC, REFUSAL, CORRUPT, FREEZE, BREACH), proving that separating computation from authorization yields the minimal possible Trusted Computing Base (TCB) on raw silicon.</p><p><br></p><p>===============================================================================</p><p dir="ltr">Conformance Status: 100% Certified / Production Locked</p><p dir="ltr">License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)</p>

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Provenance · 3 source records, 23 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
ZivaHuboai:figshare.com:article/339714406 d agoJSON v1
Deakin Research Onlineoai:figshare.com:article/339714406 d agoJSON v1
DMU Figshareoai:figshare.com:article/339714406 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
access_levelsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:460610mapping · zivahub uct ac zavocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['Operating systems']
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:460610mapping · figshare dmu ac ukvocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['Operating systems']
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:460610mapping · dro deakin edu auvocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['Operating systems']
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:460904mapping · figshare dmu ac ukvocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['Information security management']
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:460904mapping · zivahub uct ac zavocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['Information security management']
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:460904mapping · dro deakin edu auvocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['Information security management']
concepts[field].local:field:computer-science-aimapping · dro deakin edu auconnector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:computer-science-aimapping · figshare dmu ac ukconnector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:computer-science-aimapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · dro deakin edu auconnector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · figshare dmu ac ukconnector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:engineeringmapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:engineeringmapping · dro deakin edu auconnector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:engineeringmapping · figshare dmu ac ukconnector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:humanitiesmapping · figshare dmu ac ukconnector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:humanitiesmapping · dro deakin edu auconnector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:humanitiesmapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
descriptionsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
licensesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/rights
publication_datesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
titlesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title