Replication Data for: Figs 16.1, 16.2, 16.3, BTPDs, Mating call, Details, 23 May 2026

I did NOT use Nyanzol markers for analysis of data in this file. When a single BTPD female elicited >=2 MCs, I have shown all MCs on separate lines. In these cases, I only show the BTPD number for the first case.

One BTPD number per black-tail female per year--unless the female had a second period of estrus These data used for Fig 16.2, 16.3, and 16.4 in Hoogland 2026---but NOT 16.5. This file ready for longterm storage on 21 March 2025. Notice that MANY females did not elicit a single Mating Call Number of males that gave MC = number of different males that gave at least one MC Cumulative number of separate MCs for each female = total, cumulative number of MCs for each estrous female Length of each MC = Mean (average) length of each MC for each estrous female (mins) Remember: Many females did not elicit a single MC (i.e., Cumulative number of MCs = 0) MC = Mating Call Two mating calls were not considered separate unless they were separated by >=30 seconds.

When a female elicited 3 separate MCs, for example, I list the female once, but I list the 3 MCs on 3 separate lines. Two mating calls were not considered separate unless they were separated by >=30 seconds. I considered data from the same prairie dog in different years to be independent.

Each female could have SEVERAL lengths of each MC if she elicited several MCs--but she could have only ONE Cumulative time for all MCs for each single female All lengths in MINUTES. Each female could have SEVERAL lengths of each MC if she elicited several MCs--but she could have only ONE Cumulative time for all MCs for each single female Each female also could have only one Mean duration of MCs for this female. File name = Figs 16.1, 16.2, 16.3, BTPDs, Mating call, Details, 23 May 2026