Data · collection · 2014
Public Opinion and the Roberts Court
Listed in DataCite
The Supreme Court theoretically acts as a counter-majoritarian institution considering its small and appointed membership.
Description
Despite this, it largely makes decisions that are in line with the opinions of Americans. This study examines the Roberts Court to determine the extent to which it references and reflects public opinion.
The scholarship on previous courts shows that its decisions are generally consistent with public opinion. Although the Roberts Court is relatively new, this study aims to shed some light on whether the court continues to follow its tradition of agreeing with the mass or more narrow public opinion. Results were largely inconclusive, yet this examination shows that the Roberts Court does agree with public opinion about sixty-three percent of the time.
Links
Where it is published
- Repository landing page hdl.handle.net/1903/16188 ↗
landing page · from DataCite
- DOI doi.org/10.13016/m2g32s ↗
DOI / persistent id · from DataCite
Catalogue records · 2
- DataCite API api.datacite.org/dois/10.13016/m2g32s ↗
metadata API · from DataCite
- DataCite Commons commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.13016/m2g32s ↗
catalogue entry · from DataCite
Topics
- Stated by source
- Political science
- From keywords
- Political science
Provenance · 1 source records, 4 field assertions
| Source | Key | Last seen | Raw |
|---|---|---|---|
| DataCite | 10.13016/m2g32s | 14 d ago | JSON v1 |
| Field | Assertion | Extractor | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| concepts[field].fos:political-science | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | |
| description | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | /data/attributes/descriptions |
| publication_date | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | /data/attributes/dates |
| title | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | /data/attributes/titles/0/title |