Constarium
← Search

Data · dataset · 2021

Laury de Jonge - PhD project data for study 1

Listed in IISH Dataverse and ODISSEI Portal — shown once because both records carry DOI 10.34894/bz6tap

Validity in Workplace-Based Assessment (WBA) mainly depends on how stakeholders (e.g. clinical supervisors and learners) use the assessments-rather than on the intrinsic qualities of instruments and methods.

Description

Current research on assessment in clinical contexts seems to imply that variable behaviours during performance assessment of both assessors and learners may well reflect their respective beliefs and perspectives towards WBA.

We therefore performed a Q methodological study to explore perspectives underlying stakeholders' behaviours in WBA in a postgraduate medical training program. Five different perspectives on performance assessment were extracted: Agency, Mutuality, Objectivity, Adaptivity and Accountability. These perspectives reflect both differences and similarities in stakeholder perceptions and preferences regarding the utility of WBA.

Read the rest (3 more)

In comparing and contrasting the various perspectives, we identified two key areas of disagreement, specifically 'the locus of regulation of learning' (i.e., self-regulated versus externally regulated learning) and 'the extent to which assessment should be standardised' (i.e., tailored versus standardised assessment). Differing perspectives may variously affect stakeholders' acceptance, use-and, consequently, the effectiveness-of assessment programmes.

The file dataqstudyLPJWMdeJonge.docx contains the raw output of our data as composed by the PQmethod programme (schmolck.org/qmethod/). Transcripts per interview are stored in separate word files, together with an atlas-ti datafile containing the qualitative analysis. The file dataqstudyLPJWMdeJonge.docx contains the raw output of our data as composed by the PQmethod programme (schmolck.org/qmethod/).

Transcripts per interview are stored in separate word files, together with an atlas-ti datafile containing the qualitative analysis.

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 2

Topics

Stated by source
Social Sciences · Social Sciences
From keywords
Medicine & Health · Medicine & Health · Social Science · Social Science
Provenance · 2 source records, 12 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
IISH Dataversedoi:10.34894/BZ6TAP10 d agoJSON v1
ODISSEI Portaldoi:10.34894/BZ6TAP6 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
concepts[field].dataverse_subject:social-sciencessource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].dataverse_subject:social-sciencessource · portal odissei nlconnector:portal_odissei_nl@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].local:field:medicine-healthmapping · portal odissei nlconnector:portal_odissei_nl@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].local:field:medicine-healthmapping · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].local:field:social-sciencemapping · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].local:field:social-sciencemapping · portal odissei nlconnector:portal_odissei_nl@1.0.0/subjects
created_datesource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0
descriptionsource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/description
publication_datesource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0
titlesource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/name
updated_datesource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0
version_labelsource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0