← Search

Data · dataset · 2026

Use of a genetic algorithm approach for improving precision and efficiency of tests for estimating premorbid cognitive ability

Listed in UCL Research Data Repository

Description

<p dir="ltr">The 50-item National Adult Reading Test (NART; Nelson, 1982; NART–R; Nelson & Willison, 1991), first published in the UK in 1982, remains a widely used method for estimating premorbid intelligence in neurological patients.</p><p dir="ltr">We recently restandardised the NART against the most recent revision of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV; Bright et al., 2018) and have confirmed the utility of the NART and other tests based on oral reading in the estimation of premorbid full-scale IQ (FSIQ) in a range of neurological conditions (Bright et al., 2002; Bright et al., 2020).

Nevertheless, such tests may contain words that provide little or no diagnostic power (i.e., can be eliminated without negatively affecting prediction accuracy). We recently proposed a genetic algorithm (GA)-based method (see Box 1) that tackles the computationally intractable problem of identifying optimal subsets of words from premorbid IQ word-reading tests.</p><p dir="ltr">Using this method we identified a subset of 17 of the original 50 NART words that predict FSIQ as accurately as the entire test (van der Linde & Bright, 2018).

Read the rest (2 more)

Abbreviated tests have multiple benefits: they reduce the burden on patients and clinicians, help to ameliorate fatigue effects, reduce anxiety and embarrassment for low-scoring participants and potentially reduce the exposure of patients to clinicians at a time of increased caution due to Covid-19.</p><p dir="ltr">In Study 1 we:</p><p dir="ltr">1. Ran a confirmatory analysis on predictive precision of the 17-item NART subset using a new cohort of participants and compared predictive accuracy of the NART to Spot-the-Word 2 (STW-2; Baddeley & Crawford, 2012)</p><p dir="ltr">2.

Applied our GA procedure to the STW-2 to determine whether an abbreviated version of this test might similarly offer equivalent or enhanced precision in the estimation of WAIS-IV full-scale IQ.</p><p dir="ltr">In Study 2 we:</p><p dir="ltr">3. Identified an optimal subset of TOPF stimuli using our GA method and ran a confirmatory analysis in an independent cohort of participants</p>

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Provenance · 1 source records, 9 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
UCL Research Data Repositoryoai:figshare.com:article/3404868913 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
access_levelsource · rdr ucl ac ukconnector:rdr_ucl_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:520301mapping · rdr ucl ac ukvocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['Clinical neuropsychology']
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · rdr ucl ac ukconnector:rdr_ucl_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:life-sciencesmapping · rdr ucl ac ukconnector:rdr_ucl_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:medicine-healthmapping · rdr ucl ac ukconnector:rdr_ucl_ac_uk@1.0.0
descriptionsource · rdr ucl ac ukconnector:rdr_ucl_ac_uk@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
licensesource · rdr ucl ac ukconnector:rdr_ucl_ac_uk@1.0.0/metadata/dc/rights
publication_datesource · rdr ucl ac ukconnector:rdr_ucl_ac_uk@1.0.0
titlesource · rdr ucl ac ukconnector:rdr_ucl_ac_uk@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title