← Search

Data · dataset · 2026

<b>Explanatory Modeling of Cross-Sensor Communication Breakdown in Heterogeneous Industrial IoT Networks for Air Quality Monitoring</b>

Listed in ZivaHub and Deakin Research Online — shown once because both records carry DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.34029948.v1

<h2 dir="ltr"><i>Air quality monitoring in industrial environments now depends on networks of heterogeneous sensors: metal-oxide gas detectors, process telemetry, meteorological stations, and citizen reports.

Description

These systems are usually evaluated by how accurately their constituents measure. This article argues that their decisive failure mode is different and less well theorized cross-sensor communication breakdown, the process by which streams that individually remain valid cease to agree with one another.

Existing research addresses the detection and tolerance of faults : node failures, link failures, energy depletion, packet loss. That work has produced mature diagnostic taxonomies and fault-tolerant routing schemes, but detection is not explanation. We develop an explanatory framework that reconstitutes communication breakdown as a violation of an interaction contract : an exchange succeeds only when the receiver can reconstruct the time, place, uncertainty, and provenance of an observation, and fails whenever that reconstruction fails, whether or not the packet arrived.

Read the rest (2 more)

The framework organizes causal mechanisms across four strata radio-physical, energetic, temporal, and semantic-organizational and specifies two propagation mechanisms. </i><i>Cascade</i><i> occurs when a disturbance in one stratum displaces the operating point of another; </i><i>masquerade</i><i> occurs when the signature of one stratum becomes indistinguishable from that of another. We derive four testable propositions and state the practical consequence : under masquerade, an absence of data is systematically misread as an absence of pollution.

The framework reframes monitoring reliability as an explanatory problem rather than a detection problem, with direct implications for how industrial networks are instrumented, diagnosed, and procured.</i></h2><p></p>

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Inferred from text
Environmental engineering 74%
Provenance · 2 source records, 10 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
ZivaHuboai:figshare.com:article/3402994813 d agoJSON v1
Deakin Research Onlineoai:figshare.com:article/3402994813 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
access_levelsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].anzsrc:group:4011enrichment · zivahub uct ac zataxonomy-embedding@1.1.0title+keywords+description (74%)
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · dro deakin edu auconnector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:engineeringmapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:engineeringmapping · dro deakin edu auconnector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0
descriptionsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
licensesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/rights
publication_datesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
titlesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title