Data · dataset · 2015
An Adaptive, Automatic Multiple-Case Deletion Technique for Detecting Influence in Regression
Listed in DataCite
Critical to any regression analysis is the identification of observations that exert a strong influence on the fitted regression model.
Description
Traditional regression influence statistics such as Cook's distance and DFFITS, each based on deleting single observations, can fail in the presence of multiple influential observations if these influential observations “mask” one another, or if other effects such as “swamping” occur. Masking refers to the situation where an observation reveals itself as influential only after one or more other observations are deleted.
Swamping occurs when points that are not actually outliers/influential are declared to be so because of the effects on the model of other unusual observations. One computationally expensive solution to these problems is the use of influence statistics that delete multiple rather than single observations. In this article, we build on previous work to produce a computationally feasible algorithm for detecting an unknown number of influential observations in the presence of masking.
Read the rest (1 more)
An important difference between our proposed algorithm and existing methods is that we focus on the data that remain after observations are deleted, rather than on the deleted observations themselves. Further, our approach uses a novel confirmatory step designed to provide a secondary assessment of identified observations. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
Links
Where it is published
- Repository landing page tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/An_Adaptive_Automatic_Multiple_Case_Deletion_… ↗
landing page · from DataCite
- DOI doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1568332 ↗
DOI / persistent id · from DataCite
Documentation and papers
- Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode ↗
license · from DataCite
- IsSupplementTo 10.1080/00401706.2014.946152 doi.org/10.1080/00401706.2014.946152 ↗
publication · from DataCite
Catalogue records · 2
- DataCite API api.datacite.org/dois/10.6084/m9.figshare.1568332 ↗
metadata API · from DataCite
- DataCite Commons commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1568332 ↗
catalogue entry · from DataCite
Topics
- Stated by source
- Health sciences · Mathematics · Sociology
- From keywords
- Life Sciences · Mathematics & Statistics · Social Science · Sociology
Provenance · 1 source records, 14 field assertions
| Source | Key | Last seen | Raw |
|---|---|---|---|
| DataCite | 10.6084/m9.figshare.1568332 | 15 d ago | JSON v1 |
| Field | Assertion | Extractor | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| access_level | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | /data/attributes/rightsList |
| byte_size | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].fos:health-sciences | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].fos:mathematics | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].fos:sociology | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:life-sciences | mapping · DataCite | vocabulary-mapper@1.0.0 | keywords['Biological Sciences'] |
| concepts[field].local:field:mathematics-statistics | mapping · DataCite | vocabulary-mapper@1.0.0 | keywords['Mathematics'] |
| concepts[field].local:field:social-science | mapping · DataCite | vocabulary-mapper@1.0.0 | keywords['Sociology'] |
| created_date | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | |
| description | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | /data/attributes/descriptions |
| license | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | /data/attributes/rightsList |
| publication_date | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | /data/attributes/dates |
| title | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | /data/attributes/titles/0/title |
| updated_date | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 |