Constarium
← Search

Data · dataset · 2026

Exploring the role of dry-EEG and machine learning methods to profile mild cognitive impairment

Listed in ZivaHub and Deakin Research Online and DMU Figshare and UCL Research Data Repository — shown once because both records carry DOI 10.17034/32631108.v1

Background:<br>Alzheimer’s Research UK reports 850,000 individuals are living with dementia in the UK today and this is estimated to increase to one million by 2025.

Description

Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), a type of dementia, accounts for approximately 60% of all diagnoses and as yet, there is no cure. Diagnosis rates in high income countries are below half and achieving acceptable levels of coverage and access to care is the challenge currently being faced (World Health Organization, 2015).<br><br>Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a pre-clinical form of AD (Petersen, 2011) and is manifested by mild symptoms affecting cognitive function, without interference in daily activities.

Neurodegeneration, defined by synaptic dysfunction, occurs decades prior to any symptoms emerging (Albert et al., 2011) interrupting electrical communication between neurones. <br><br>Methods:<br>A multi assessment approach using a wireless, dry-EEG system was used to explore the potential of recording brain activity outside the laboratory and in a more informal setting. Participants with MCI and neurotypical controls completed a neuropsychological assessment and computerized tasks designed to probe cognitive function where deficits are expected in MCI.

Read the rest (5 more)

Event related potential technique was applied to the EEG and features of interest were extracted for further analysis using supervised machine learning methods. <br><br>Analysis and Results:<br>Analysis was carried out on a group level and individual level. The latter involved training algorithms on a range of data models to identify patterns in the data with feature combinations predicting group membership of individuals with accuracy.

Randomisation tests confirmed that there no differences found at a group level when considering the groups’ performance during episodic memory, language, executive function (working memory) or attention tasks. <br><br>For analysis at an individual level, improved model accuracies with the addition of ERP features to neuropsychological features were reported for the language and attention task. A combination of features, namely an ERP feature and neuropsychological feature were selected by the algorithms as features contributing to the best model.<br><br>Discussion:<br>The four EEG tasks in this study were designed to probe cognitive function known to deteriorate in individuals with MCI.

Considering the trajectory of cognitive decline is essential when interpreting differences, or indeed no differences between the groups. However, a difference between the groups with respect to episodic memory would have been expected since it is the cognitive function upon which their diagnosis is based: this finding most likely points to the low power of the study. Feature selection was of interest across the tasks and provided insight into potential predictors of progression to AD relative to the cognitive function.

However, due to the heterogeneity of MCI, it is with caution that these features are discussed since it is unknown who within the MCI group would progress to AD. <br><br>Conclusion:<br>The study was a proof of concept exploring cognitive function using a wireless dry-EEG headset outside a laboratory or hospital setting. The benefits of this system included a quick and easy set-up without compromising the quality of data.

This approach could provide an efficient and affordable way to extend research into more accessible locations such as health centres and at home.<br>

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Inferred from text
Biological psychology 71% · Disease 75%
Provenance · 4 source records, 18 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
ZivaHuboai:figshare.com:article/326311088 d agoJSON v1
Deakin Research Onlineoai:figshare.com:article/326311088 d agoJSON v1
DMU Figshareoai:figshare.com:article/326311088 d agoJSON v1
UCL Research Data Repositoryoai:figshare.com:article/326311088 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
concepts[disease].local:disease:diseaseenrichment · zivahub uct ac zakeyword-concept-rules@1.0.0title+description (75%)
concepts[field].anzsrc:group:5202enrichment · zivahub uct ac zataxonomy-embedding@1.1.0title+keywords+description (71%)
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · dro deakin edu auconnector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · rdr ucl ac ukconnector:rdr_ucl_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · figshare dmu ac ukconnector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:humanitiesmapping · dro deakin edu auconnector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:humanitiesmapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:humanitiesmapping · figshare dmu ac ukconnector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:humanitiesmapping · rdr ucl ac ukconnector:rdr_ucl_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:psychology-behavioralmapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:psychology-behavioralmapping · figshare dmu ac ukconnector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:psychology-behavioralmapping · rdr ucl ac ukconnector:rdr_ucl_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:psychology-behavioralmapping · dro deakin edu auconnector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0
descriptionsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
license_textsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
publication_datesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
titlesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title