Data · collection · 2019
Are Reading Interventions for English Language Learners Effective? A Meta-Analysis
Listed in DataCite
Despite concerted efforts to improve the reading skills of English language learners (ELLs), it remains unclear if the interventions they have been receiving produce any positive results.
Description
Thus, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to examine how effective reading interventions are in improving ELLs’ reading skills and what factors may influence their effectiveness. Twenty-six studies with reported outcomes for pretest and posttest were selected, and four moderators (group size, intensity of intervention, students’ risk status, and type of intervention) were coded.
The results of random-effects analyses showed that the reading interventions had a large effect on ELLs’ reading accuracy ( d = 1.221) and reading fluency ( d = 0.802) and a moderate effect on reading comprehension ( d = 0.499). In addition, for real-word reading accuracy, intervention groups composed of more than five students were less effective than groups composed of two to five students, and longer intervention sessions were less effective than shorter ones.
Read the rest (1 more)
Overall, our findings suggest that reading interventions have positive effects on ELLs’ reading skills, and they should not be delayed until these students have reached a certain level of oral English proficiency.
Links
Where it is published
- Repository landing page sage.figshare.com/collections/Are_Reading_Interventions_for_English_Language_Lea… ↗
landing page · from DataCite
- DOI doi.org/10.25384/sage.c.4383446.v1 ↗
DOI / persistent id · from DataCite
Documentation and papers
- CC BY 4.0 creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 ↗
license · from DataCite
- IsSupplementTo 10.1177/0022219419825855 doi.org/10.1177/0022219419825855 ↗
publication · from DataCite
Catalogue records · 2
- DataCite API api.datacite.org/dois/10.25384/sage.c.4383446.v1 ↗
metadata API · from DataCite
- DataCite Commons commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25384/sage.c.4383446.v1 ↗
catalogue entry · from DataCite
Topics
- Stated by source
- Educational sciences · Psychology
- Inferred from text
- Curriculum and pedagogy 69%
Related
Provenance · 1 source records, 10 field assertions
| Source | Key | Last seen | Raw |
|---|---|---|---|
| DataCite | 10.25384/sage.c.4383446.v1 | 15 d ago | JSON v1 |
| Field | Assertion | Extractor | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| access_level | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | /data/attributes/rightsList |
| concepts[field].anzsrc:group:3901 | enrichment · DataCite | taxonomy-embedding@1.1.0 | title+keywords+description (69%) |
| concepts[field].fos:educational-sciences | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].fos:psychology | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | |
| created_date | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | |
| description | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | /data/attributes/descriptions |
| license | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | /data/attributes/rightsList |
| publication_date | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | /data/attributes/dates |
| title | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | /data/attributes/titles/0/title |
| updated_date | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 |