KIC star parallaxes from asteroseismology vs Gaia

We show that previously identified offsets between TGAS parallaxes and distances derived from asteroseismology and eclipsing binaries have likely been overestimated for parallaxes <~5-10mas (~90%-98% of the TGAS sample). The observed differences in our sample can furthermore be partially compensated by adopting a hotter Teff scale (such as the infrared flux method) instead of spectroscopic temperatures for dwarfs and subgiants.

Residual systematic differences are at the ~2% level in parallax across three orders of magnitude. We use TGAS parallaxes to empirically demonstrate that asteroseismic radii are accurate to ~5% or better for stars between ~0.8-8R_{sun}_. We find no significant offset for main- sequence (<~1.5R_{sun}_) and low-luminosity RGB stars (~3-8R_{sun}_), but seismic radii appear to be systematically underestimated by ~5% for subgiants (~1.5-3R_{sun}_).