Peer review procedures - results from a survey among journal editors

Based on an inventory peer review procedures listing 12 dimensions of review it asks editors to indicate how their journal organizes review with respect to each of these dimensions and whether this has changed since this year 2000. The study was done in the context of a research project aiming to assess the effectiveness of different review procedures in flagging problematic publications as well as the extent in which novel and innovative review formats have been implemented across journals.

Three responses have been anonimised for privacy concerns Depositor provided 'Dataset - Survey responses.xlsx'. DANS provided the .ods version of this file.