Foundational Status Audit of Registration Theory: Scale, Counting, Dynamical Underdetermination, Consequence Structure, and Primitive Multiplicity

<p dir="ltr">This foundational status audit consolidates a sequence of stress tests of Registration Theory (Physical Foundations) concerning physical scale, invariant counting, ACRF parameter provenance, dynamical underdetermination, consequence structure, coarse-graining, complex structure, registration occurrence, and primitive multiplicity.</p><p dir="ltr">The audit establishes a strict distinction between results derived from primitive Registration Theory and results that hold conditionally within canonical ACRF-4 or other proposed downstream structures.</p><p dir="ltr">The principal findings are:</p><p dir="ltr">Primitive Registration Theory presently provides a substantial architecture of operative distinction, relational organization, persistence, equivalence, and structural symmetry.

Still, it does not yet uniquely determine token multiplicity, physical consequence content, successor dynamics, host coarse-graining, observable maps, or a dimensionful physical scale.</p><p dir="ltr">Canonical ACRF-4 parameters and the choice n = 4 are not presently derived from primitive RT. Consequently, results such as the 1+3 decomposition, transverse instability, retention multiplier, nonlinear amplification, and dynamically selected local complex structure remain exact conditional results of canonical ACRF-4 rather than universal RT predictions.</p><p dir="ltr">The audit further separates occurrence, multiplicity, and persistence.