← Search

Data · dataset · 2026

<b>Empirical Performance Evaluation of Heterogeneous IoT Sensor Clusters for Real-Time Industrial Gas Dispersion Tracking</b>

Listed in ZivaHub and Deakin Research Online — shown once because both records carry DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.34029933.v1

<h2 dir="ltr"><i>Heterogeneous sensor clusters are now the standard instrument for tracking industrial gas dispersion, yet the field lacks an evaluation framework that measures what these clusters actually deliver.

Description

Existing evidence is fragmented in a specific and consequential way: performance is reported per device, per algorithm, or per isolated experiment, while the quantity that determines whether a monitoring system is useful is the performance of the cluster as a tracking instrument under real emission and meteorological conditions.

This article assembles the empirical record and shows that it supports stronger conclusions than are usually drawn from it. Published field evaluations establish that wireless gas detection networks can achieve detection rates of 91% with average detection delays of 108 s and localization accuracy of 5 m; that instrumental odour monitoring systems can exceed 95% classification accuracy once humidity and temperature interference is compensated; and that metal-oxide sensor output can be regressed against field olfactometry with RMSE between 4.02 and 6.70, depending on the regression technique.

Read the rest (2 more)

Read together, these results identify three conditions that determine cluster-level tracking performance reference anchoring, interference compensation, and deployment geometry informed by dispersion behaviour and one that is almost never reported, namely the temporal coherence of the cluster. We therefore propose an evaluation framework organized around four dimensions, each with an explicit protocol and reference metric, and derive testable propositions from the reported evidence.

The framework's central claim is that a cluster should be evaluated as a distributed measuring instrument, not as a collection of devices.</i></h2><p></p>

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Provenance · 2 source records, 13 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
ZivaHuboai:figshare.com:article/3402993313 d agoJSON v1
Deakin Research Onlineoai:figshare.com:article/3402993313 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
access_levelsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:401101mapping · dro deakin edu auvocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['Air pollution modelling and control']
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:401101mapping · zivahub uct ac zavocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['Air pollution modelling and control']
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:401102mapping · dro deakin edu auvocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['Environmentally sustainable engineering']
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:401102mapping · zivahub uct ac zavocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['Environmentally sustainable engineering']
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · dro deakin edu auconnector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:engineeringmapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:engineeringmapping · dro deakin edu auconnector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0
descriptionsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
licensesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/rights
publication_datesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
titlesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title