← Search

Data · dataset · 2025

Data set of pro-policies in four places

Listed in ScienceDB

[Purpose] The existing policy analysis methods rely heavily on manual annotation and alignment comparison, resulting in low efficiency and easy errors.

Description

This study aims to improve the efficiency of policy information retrieval, achieve intelligent analysis and comparison of policies, and provide precise decision support for policy formulation by constructing a structured policy knowledge base. [Method] This study takes the policy of benefiting enterprises as an example and proposes a framework based on the big language model for efficient comparison of relevant policies.

The framework includes the following steps: 1) Building a knowledge base; 2) Retrieval and storage; 3) Answer generation. [Results] Through the validation of the national, Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen policy datasets for benefiting enterprises, the framework proposed in this paper automatically integrates multiple policies and can analyze policy semantics to construct a database, helping to complete policy matching and analysis.

Read the rest (2 more)

The Chroma RAG model used in this study demonstrates significant advantages in Hit@1 The target has reached 60% Hit@3 The indicator reached 76%, and the MRR indicator reached 71.13%. In the comparison of retrieval methods, the performance of our research model is superior to traditional models such as Tf idf, Word2Vec, USE, BERT, SBERT, DPR, SimCSE, etc., highlighting the superiority of our method. By Hit@1 The Hit@3 Compared with evaluation indicators such as MRR, the framework and retrieval method proposed in this study have significant advantages.

[Limitations] The research is mainly based on cross-sectional data and cannot fully reflect the dynamic changes in the policy implementation process, which limits the in-depth analysis of policy effects. [Conclusion] The construction of knowledge base and policy comparison based on big language model can effectively improve the intelligent analysis and comparison effect of policy texts, especially in the construction of policy knowledge base and policy comparison support, providing significant decision support for policy makers. 

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Inferred from text
Policy and administration 73%
Provenance · 1 source records, 12 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
ScienceDB10.57760/sciencedb.j00133.0052212 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
access_levelsource · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0
concepts[field].anzsrc:group:4407enrichment · scidb cntaxonomy-embedding@1.0.0title+keywords+description (73%)
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:economics-financemapping · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:engineeringmapping · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:humanitiesmapping · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:life-sciencesmapping · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:social-sciencemapping · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0
descriptionsource · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
licensesource · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0/metadata/dc/rights
publication_datesource · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0
titlesource · scidb cnconnector:scidb_cn@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title