Constarium
← Search

Data · dataset · 2026

Understanding the evolutionary mechanisms underlying infant features in cats and their implications for animal welfare

Listed in ZivaHub and Deakin Research Online and DMU Figshare — shown once because both records carry DOI 10.17034/32638518.v1

Cats have had a long association with humans, in which they have undergone some natural and artificial evolutionary selection.

Description

However, despite this long history with humans, cats are regarded as semi-domesticated, having the ability to revert back to their wild state and survive without humans’ intervention. Cats are a truly unique species, with an interesting relationship with humans.

This thesis attempts to explore one of the elements associated with this relationship; ‘baby schema’, or ‘infant features’. Baby schema are mostly facial elements which characterise human infants; a large head and forehead, big low-lying eyes, bulging cheeks and a small nose and mouth. Baby schema are an easily identifiable sign of vulnerability and youth and triggers innate response in humans that perceive these facial characteristics as ‘cute’.

Read the rest (6 more)

Infants perceived as ‘cute’ attract the attention of caregivers, whilst promoting nurturing responses and inhibiting aggression. This effect can also be seen in response to animals that possess these features. Cats naturally exhibit high levels of baby schema.

Baby schema have been shown to attract the attention of caregivers and help with the development of emotional bonds between parents and their offspring. The aim of this thesis was to explore how baby schema in cats can be best measured, and to assess the impact of baby schema in cats on the nature of the human-animal bond and animal welfare. Four studies are presented in this thesis.

Chapter 2 developed a novel method of measuring objective cuteness, which reflected the shape of the eye and was further validated in each of the studies it was used in (Chapter 2-4). Chapter 2 used this new objective measure to explore the effect of cuteness on cats’ length of stay within an animal shelter, which determined there was a lack of evidence that cuteness had an influence on adoption choice. Chapter 3 investigated how baby schema and human personality traits associated to psychopathy affect the human-animal bond.

This found that cuteness or the possession of psychopathic traits had little influence of on individuals’ attachment to pets within the home. However, there was evidence of an effect of pet owner’s demographic and lifestyle factors such as parental status and gender. Chapter 4 assessed the influence that the wording in adoption profiles which describes the cat’s sociability/personality has on participants cuteness perception and adoption choice.

This study determined there was not enough evidence to suggest that an individual’s perception of a cat’s personality influences their perception of the animal’s cuteness. However, there was an influence on the cat’s adoptability, with cats with positively worded adoption profiles being rated as more adoptable. To determine the most important region of the face when assessing cuteness Chapter 5 looked at the effect of kitten age on cuteness perception and assessed participants eye movements.

Chapter 5 found that the kittens age had very little influence on individuals cuteness perception, however, it was confirmed that the eyes are the most important region for cuteness assessment. Overall, the thesis found that the roundness of the eyes is key to assessing cuteness in cats. Additionally, it was determined that cats’ morphological traits have less of an influence than their sociability and personality on their welfare, regardless of their environment.<br><br>

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Provenance · 3 source records, 10 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
ZivaHuboai:figshare.com:article/326385185 d agoJSON v1
Deakin Research Onlineoai:figshare.com:article/326385185 d agoJSON v1
DMU Figshareoai:figshare.com:article/326385185 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:300306mapping · figshare dmu ac ukvocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['animal welfare']
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:300306mapping · zivahub uct ac zavocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['animal welfare']
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:300306mapping · dro deakin edu auvocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['animal welfare']
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · dro deakin edu auconnector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · figshare dmu ac ukconnector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0
descriptionsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
license_textsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
publication_datesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
titlesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title