Constarium
← Search

Data · dataset · 2026

Supplementary file 1_ISIT: a frame-clustering implicit measure of situated experience.docx

Listed in NCL Data

Description

Introduction<p>The Implicit Situation Intensity Test (ISIT) is a method for converting participants’ verbal reports about an experience into a quantitative, per-participant implicit measure of how strongly cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and value-laden frames have been activated by that experience.</p>Method<p>ISIT operates by clustering frames extracted from the verbal report’s extended knowledge graph (XKG)—the structured representation produced by the POLANYI++ neurosymbolic pipeline—into a Frame Ontology (FO) and scoring each frame’s salience for each participant on a normalized scale.

The implicit measure produced by ISIT is designed to be combined with explicit measures from standardized questionnaires, implicit measures from physiological sensors, and participant profile information, in a single multivariate analysis of situated experience, producing participant-level scores, suitable for psychometric integration.</p>Results<p>We illustrate the method through the Lucifora et al. study on virtual male embodiment in a catcalling scenario (n = 36), in which a 37-indicator Frame Ontology spanning four domains (emotional states, behavioral responses, violence perception, and semantic markers), whose frame clusters entered the study’s multivariate correlation structure alongside the standardized instruments and emotion ratings; safety-related frames showed differential correlation patterns with anger and sadness versus with fear that simpler instruments do not capture.

Read the rest (2 more)

To place the extraction itself on an auditable footing, every frame the pipeline produced was adjudicated by a tacit-aware judge (DEEPJUDGE) and human-verified: frame-level precision on a warrant criterion was high (0.95–0.96 across two foundation-model backends, with near-zero over-projection), and the two backends produced markedly more similar profiles for the same report than for different ones.</p>Discussion<p>ISIT shares with grounded theory (GT) and computational grounded theory (CGT) the inductive commitment that situational structure should emerge from data, but it differs in three operational respects: it operates on structured extended knowledge graphs (XKGs) rather than raw text; it produces participant-level numerical scores rather than corpus-level qualitative themes; and it integrates by design with other measurement channels rather than standing as a free-standing qualitative analysis.

ISIT fills the verbal-channel gap in the cognitive-science measurement ecosystem: it is the implicit-measure complement to autonomic, behavioral, and questionnaire-based instruments, not their replacement. Convergent and divergent validity against standard implicit measures, predictive validity against behavioral outcomes, and multi-modal integration validation are set out as a defined roadmap.</p>

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Inferred from text
Text 75%
Provenance · 1 source records, 9 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
NCL Dataoai:figshare.com:article/3407213117 h agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
access_levelsource · data ncl ac ukconnector:data_ncl_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].anzsrc:group:5201mapping · data ncl ac ukvocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['Applied Psychology']
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · data ncl ac ukconnector:data_ncl_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:psychology-behavioralmapping · data ncl ac ukconnector:data_ncl_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[modality].local:modality:textenrichment · data ncl ac ukkeyword-concept-rules@1.0.0title+description (75%)
descriptionsource · data ncl ac ukconnector:data_ncl_ac_uk@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
licensesource · data ncl ac ukconnector:data_ncl_ac_uk@1.0.0/metadata/dc/rights
publication_datesource · data ncl ac ukconnector:data_ncl_ac_uk@1.0.0
titlesource · data ncl ac ukconnector:data_ncl_ac_uk@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title