← Search

Data · dataset · 2026

The subject in the big data era: reading fictions of algorithmic manipulation

Listed in ZivaHub and Deakin Research Online and DMU Figshare and UCL Research Data Repository — shown once because both records carry DOI 10.17034/32631048.v1

My thesis explores fiction’s response to the question of how the contemporary internet is reshaping subjectivity.

Description

Through case studies on Joshua Cohen’s Book of Numbers (2015), Nicola Barker’s H(A)PPY (2017), David Foster Wallace’s The Pale King (2011), and Neal Stephenson’s Fall; or, Dodge in Hell (2019), my thesis identifies the extent to which fiction can encourage contestation of a particular understanding of digital culture.

I loosely consider these novels as a subset that has evolved from the “systems novels” defined by Tom LeClair in the 1980s—novels which seek to unpack how human beings are formed, informed, and deformed by the intersection and collision of social systems. To this end, I explore how fiction can reveal the systems which underpin digital culture and, by revealing them to be constructed, encourage the reader to consider how they may be reconstructed.

Read the rest (2 more)

In order to explore how these systems are depicted in fiction, I define the key characteristics of what I have called “algorithmic manipulation”—specific characteristics of algorithms which contribute to digital culture’s ability to reshape subjects and subjective experience. This framework draws upon existing digital culture scholarship, including the work of Antoinette Rouvroy, Shoshana Zuboff and Byung-Chul Han, as well as upon the theory of computation.

But on a broader level, my framework draws upon and extends Michel Foucault’s bio-power concept, to consider how algorithms herd subjects en masse, and Ludwig Wittgenstein’s philosophy of language. My use of the latter interrogates to what extent the fact that algorithms are inscribed in code has had an influence on digital culture. I argue that algorithmic manipulation functions through language and through narrative, and it is on these two fields that literature can most effectively engage with and encourage the contestation of digital culture.<br><br><br><i>Thesis embargoed until 31st December 2025 </i>

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Inferred from text
Digital literature 76%
Provenance · 4 source records, 13 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
ZivaHuboai:figshare.com:article/3263104813 d agoJSON v1
Deakin Research Onlineoai:figshare.com:article/3263104813 d agoJSON v1
DMU Figshareoai:figshare.com:article/3263104813 d agoJSON v1
UCL Research Data Repositoryoai:figshare.com:article/3263104813 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:470508enrichment · zivahub uct ac zataxonomy-embedding@1.1.0title+keywords+description (76%)
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · dro deakin edu auconnector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · figshare dmu ac ukconnector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · rdr ucl ac ukconnector:rdr_ucl_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:humanitiesmapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:humanitiesmapping · dro deakin edu auconnector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:humanitiesmapping · rdr ucl ac ukconnector:rdr_ucl_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:humanitiesmapping · figshare dmu ac ukconnector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0
descriptionsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
license_textsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
publication_datesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
titlesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title