Modeling and co-creation of men's health interventions: prioritization, feasibility, and suitability for implementation

Statistical analyses included the Kruskal-Wallis test, Benjamini-Hochberg correction, Dunn’s post-hoc test with Holm adjustment, and the exact sign test. Open-ended responses underwent content analysis and were interpreted using the CFIR framework. Results: Content Validity Indices (CVI) ranged from 0.91 to 0.97.

Participants included 103 service users, 137 professionals, and 143 managers. No differences were found between groups regarding priority or adaptation. Feasibility ratings varied across the 18 actions, with users providing lower scores.

Priority ratings exceeded feasibility ratings for 17 actions. Seven actions scored above the median in both dimensions. Facilitators included staff training, management, communication, and active outreach; barriers included issues related to masculinities, adherence, and work organization.

Conclusion: There was convergence regarding priority but divergence regarding feasibility, providing insights to guide the selection and adaptation of interventions.</b></p>