← Search

Data · dataset · 2026

Assessing internal noise levels in powered air purifying respirators using standardized manikin sizes in a laboratory setting

Listed in ZivaHub

<p>Powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs) generate internal noise from the blower and result in turbulent airflow.

Description

Internal noise may reduce speech clarity and increase listening effort during critical tasks. This study examined how PAPR brand and user configuration factors affected internal noise levels.

A total of 1,200 internal PAPR noise measurements were recorded on a manikin across multiple experimental conditions: two PAPR brands, five manikin sizes, hair or shroud attached (Yes/No), and both hair and shroud attached. The generalized linear mixed model with a rank-based nonparametric test was used to analyze the bivariate association between variables, given the abnormal distribution of the mean noise data. The use of the active 3M PAPR on a small manikin produced the highest mean noise level [70.7 dBA; 95% confidence interval (CI): 70.31 to 71.16] at baseline (i.e., without hair or shroud), while use on a medium manikin had the lowest (57.3 dBA; CI: 56.87 to 57.72).

Read the rest (2 more)

The 3M PAPR was significantly louder (Mean difference: 4.1 dBA; CI: 3.44 to 4.72) than the MAXAIR at baseline, though after adjusting for PAPR brand and manikin size, and considering hair and shroud individually, MAXAIR was slightly but significantly louder (Mean difference: 0.5 dBA; CI: 0.20 to 0. 90). The presence of hair was associated with a significant reduction (Mean reduction: 2.31 dBA; CI: 0. 98 to 3.65) in internal noise levels after adjusting for PAPR brand and manikin.

Use of a shroud alone had a small, nonsignificant effect (Mean difference: 0.78 dBA; CI: −0.55 to 2.11) on noise levels. However, the combined effect of hair and a shroud, when comparing “Both <i>vs.</i> None,” resulted in a lower noise level (Mean difference: 3.08 dBA; CI: −0.01 to 6.17), although this reduction was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.101). These findings suggest the need to focus on blower and airflow design, along with considering acoustic dampening near the ears, to improve communication during use.</p>

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Inferred from text
Audio 65%
Provenance · 1 source records, 9 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
ZivaHuboai:figshare.com:article/3402765713 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
access_levelsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:440710mapping · zivahub uct ac zavocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['Science Policy']
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:medicine-healthmapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[modality].local:modality:audioenrichment · zivahub uct ac zakeyword-concept-rules@1.0.0title+description (65%)
descriptionsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
licensesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/rights
publication_datesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
titlesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title