← Search

Data · dataset · 2024

Testing Reflexive Practitioner Dialogues: Capacities for Socio-Technical Integration in Meditation Research

Listed in IISH Dataverse and ODISSEI Portal — shown once because both records carry DOI 10.34894/zg5gmb

Over the last two decades, policies and research programs advancing socio-technical integration have been introduced across the globe to incorporate societal considerations into research and development practices.

Description

In consequence, technoscientific practitioners find themselves in a tension between taking responsibility to respond to ethical and societal issues while operating in wider institutional and political structures which enable and constrain their agency.

We study practitioners’ capacities for navigating this tension through reflexive engagement with socio-technical integration. We focus on mindfulness researchers because they actively pursue integrative activities to maintain their hybrid role identity. They perceive frictions between their scientific and their contemplative selves within the new public management regime in the academy.

Read the rest (2 more)

We examine how they enact various forms of socio-technical integration in work-related decision-making to engage with these frictions. In two online workshops, we invited mindfulness researchers to collaboratively engage with impending decisions in reflexive practitioner dialogues guided by the decision protocol of Socio-Technical-Integration Research (STIR) and conducted follow-up interviews about their experiences thereof.

Our data set comprises eight files, among which there are four types of transcripts pertaining to each workshop: transcripts of (1) online workshops, (2) practitioner dialogues (also referred to as reflection exercises), (3) interviews, (4) STIR decision grids. We completed the decision grids based on audio-recorded practitioner dialogues in preparation for the interviews.

Links

Topics

Stated by source
Social Sciences · Social Sciences
Inferred from text
Sociology 69%
Provenance · 2 source records, 11 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
IISH Dataversedoi:10.34894/ZG5GMB12 d agoJSON v1
ODISSEI Portaldoi:10.34894/ZG5GMB8 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
concepts[field].anzsrc:group:4410enrichment · datasets iisg amsterdamtaxonomy-embedding@1.1.0title+keywords+description (69%)
concepts[field].dataverse_subject:social-sciencessource · portal odissei nlconnector:portal_odissei_nl@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].dataverse_subject:social-sciencessource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].local:field:social-sciencemapping · portal odissei nlconnector:portal_odissei_nl@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].local:field:social-sciencemapping · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/subjects
created_datesource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0
descriptionsource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/description
publication_datesource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0
titlesource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/name
updated_datesource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0
version_labelsource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0