Data · collection · 2020
NOMENCLATURAL, CURATORIAL, AND ARCHIVAL BEST PRACTICES fOR SYMBIOTYPES AND OTHER TYPE MATERIALS IN NATURAL HISTORY COLLECTIONS
Listed in GBIF
Description
This dataset contains the digitized treatments in Plazi based on the original journal article Bradley, Robert D., Bradley, Lisa C., Honeycutt, Rodney L., Macdonald, Kathryn A., Amarilla-Stevens, Heidi N., Stevens, Richard D. (2020): NOMENCLATURAL, CURATORIAL, AND ARCHIVAL BEST PRACTICES fOR SYMBIOTYPES AND OTHER TYPE MATERIALS IN NATURAL HISTORY COLLECTIONS. Occasional Papers of the Museum 366: 1-20 ABSTRACT The emergence of several zoonotically-driven pandemics and near-pandemics (MERS, SARS, H1N1, Ebola, COVID-19, among others) over the last 20 years has placed an increasing emphasis on the importance of symbiotypes and the role of natural history collections, as virologic and human health studies are incorporating symbiotypes and host specimens as part of their research response.
Because designation of symbiotypes and host specimens involves natural history collections, there is a growing need for a discussion pertaining to the archival integration of information on symbiotypes, host specimens, and associated data in natural history collections. Furthermore, due to the involvement of specialized researchers, such as virologists and epidemiologists, there is an expanding portion of the zoonotic research community that is further removed from research practices involving the principles of nomenclature and the rules and standards governing the description of taxa new to science.
Read the rest (2 more)
Finally, as the number of traditional field biologists and natural history museum curators retire and are not replaced, there is an increasing urgency to develop protocols and procedures for the establishment of best practices and to standardize methodologies in zoonotic research for all participants. In this paper, the authors: 1) outline a number of nomenclatural, curatorial, and archival best practices for the treatment of symbiotypes in natural history collections; 2) introduce the concept of the symbioparatype and symbiotopotype, which represents a compromise between the conflicting mission of natural history museums to protect archivally important specimens and the ever-growing demand for critical research material; and 3) comment on multiple standards and guidelines to assist a broad array of researchers ranging from field biologists and systematists to virologists and public health scientists.
Key words: archival preservation, genetic resource collections, protocols, symbioparatypes, symbiotopotypes, symbiotypes, zoonoses
Links
Get the data
Where it is published
- GBIF dataset page gbif.org/dataset/28ff109e-0788-4cb2-9b1a-96241ca67bef ↗
landing page · from gbif
- DOI doi.org/10.15468/7gyrby ↗
DOI / persistent id · from gbif
Documentation and papers
- Publisher page tb.plazi.org/GgServer/summary/FFCC8B19FFE9A834FFEAAB65567BC75A ↗
documentation · from gbif
Catalogue records · 1
- GBIF API api.gbif.org/v1/dataset/28ff109e-0788-4cb2-9b1a-96241ca67bef ↗
metadata API · from gbif
Topics
- From keywords
- Life Sciences
Provenance · 1 source records, 8 field assertions
| Source | Key | Last seen | Raw |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBIF | 28ff109e-0788-4cb2-9b1a-96241ca67bef | 11 d ago | JSON v1 |
| Field | Assertion | Extractor | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| access_level | source · gbif | connector:gbif@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:life-sciences | mapping · gbif | connector:gbif@1.0.0 | |
| created_date | source · gbif | connector:gbif@1.0.0 | |
| description | source · gbif | connector:gbif@1.0.0 | /description |
| license | source · gbif | connector:gbif@1.0.0 | |
| publication_date | source · gbif | connector:gbif@1.0.0 | |
| title | source · gbif | connector:gbif@1.0.0 | /title |
| updated_date | source · gbif | connector:gbif@1.0.0 |