Data · dataset · 2026
The responsibility to protect and the promise of protecting populations 17 years on
Listed in ZivaHub and Deakin Research Online and DMU Figshare — shown once because both records carry DOI 10.17034/32637621.v1
In an historic moment of unity, the Member States of the UN came together to agree the fundamentals of a concept that had the potential to protect populations at grave risk of harm from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity.
Description
Disillusioned by the practice of humanitarian interventions that preceded it, the international community sought an alternative proposal of how assistance could be provided to those at risk without impinging on state sovereignty.
The Responsibility to Protect was borne out of an international promise that states would firstly protect their own populations, but failing that, the international community will bear this responsibility. This promise is based upon the Three Pillars as stipulated in the 2005 World Summit Outcome Document, which will be examined in this thesis in terms of their applicability and tenacity. This thesis critically explores how traditional state sovereignty is to be balanced with the concept of the Responsibility to Protect.
Read the rest (1 more)
In doing so it will study the United Nations Security Council and General Assembly debates on the Responsibility to Protect to examine the commitment to this concept. It will assert that the Security Council is failing vulnerable populations through its reluctant and ineffective implementation of the Responsibility to Protect, particularly through the use of the current veto system. It will investigate the appetite for the Responsibility to Protect, and whether a proposed system, “Responsible Protection,” would offer an improved method of implementing the Responsibility to Protect.
Links
Where it is published
- DOI doi.org/10.17034/32637621.v1 ↗
DOI / persistent id · from zivahub uct ac za
Catalogue records · 1
- OAI-PMH record api.figshare.com/v2/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_dc&identifier=oai%3Af… ↗
metadata API · from zivahub uct ac za
Topics
Provenance · 3 source records, 10 field assertions
| Source | Key | Last seen | Raw |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZivaHub | oai:figshare.com:article/32637621 | 13 d ago | JSON v1 |
| Deakin Research Online | oai:figshare.com:article/32637621 | 13 d ago | JSON v1 |
| DMU Figshare | oai:figshare.com:article/32637621 | 13 d ago | JSON v1 |
| Field | Assertion | Extractor | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmental | mapping · zivahub uct ac za | connector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmental | mapping · figshare dmu ac uk | connector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmental | mapping · dro deakin edu au | connector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:humanities | mapping · figshare dmu ac uk | connector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:humanities | mapping · zivahub uct ac za | connector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:humanities | mapping · dro deakin edu au | connector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0 | |
| description | source · zivahub uct ac za | connector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0 | /metadata/dc/description |
| license_text | source · zivahub uct ac za | connector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0 | |
| publication_date | source · zivahub uct ac za | connector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0 | |
| title | source · zivahub uct ac za | connector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0 | /metadata/dc/title |