← Search

Data · dataset · 2025

Comparison of water models for structure prediction

Listed in ARP Research Data Repository

Topology files and simulation result datasets of the related publication.

Description

Describing the interactions of water molecules is one of the most common, yet critical, tasks in molecular dynamics simulations. Because of its unique properties, hundreds of attempts have been made to construct an ideal interaction potential model for water.

In various studies, the models have been evaluated based on their ability to reproduce different properties of water. This work focuses on the atomic-scale structure in the liquid phase of water. Forty-four classical water potential models are compared to identify those that can accurately describe the structure in alignment with experimental results.

Read the rest (2 more)

In addition to some older models that are still popular today, new or re-parametrized classical models using effective pair-additive potentials that have appeared in recent years are examined. Molecular dynamics simulations were performed over a wide range of temperatures and the resulting trajectories were used to calculate the partial radial distribution functions. The total scattering structure factors were compared with data from neutron and X-ray diffraction experiments.

Our analysis indicates that models with more than four interaction sites, as well as flexible or polarizable models with higher computational requirements, do not provide a significant advantage in accurately describing the structure. On the other hand, recent three-site models have made considerable progress in this area, although the best agreement with experimental data over the entire temperature range was achieved with four-site, TIP4P-type models.

Links

Topics

Stated by source
Chemistry · Physics
Inferred from text
Biochemistry and cell biology 70% · Simulation 75%
Provenance · 1 source records, 14 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
ARP Research Data Repositoryhdl:21.15109/ARP/NDWPXO13 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
concepts[field].anzsrc:group:3101enrichment · repo researchdata hutaxonomy-embedding@1.1.0title+keywords+description (70%)
concepts[field].dataverse_subject:chemistrysource · repo researchdata huconnector:repo_researchdata_hu@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].dataverse_subject:physicssource · repo researchdata huconnector:repo_researchdata_hu@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].local:field:chemistrymapping · repo researchdata huconnector:repo_researchdata_hu@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · repo researchdata huconnector:repo_researchdata_hu@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].local:field:life-sciencesmapping · repo researchdata huconnector:repo_researchdata_hu@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].local:field:physicsmapping · repo researchdata huconnector:repo_researchdata_hu@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[method].local:method:simulationenrichment · repo researchdata hukeyword-concept-rules@1.0.0title+description (75%)
created_datesource · repo researchdata huconnector:repo_researchdata_hu@1.0.0
descriptionsource · repo researchdata huconnector:repo_researchdata_hu@1.0.0/description
publication_datesource · repo researchdata huconnector:repo_researchdata_hu@1.0.0
titlesource · repo researchdata huconnector:repo_researchdata_hu@1.0.0/name
updated_datesource · repo researchdata huconnector:repo_researchdata_hu@1.0.0
version_labelsource · repo researchdata huconnector:repo_researchdata_hu@1.0.0