Quantifying errors in surface ozone predictions associated with clouds over the CONUS: A WRF-Chem modeling study using satellite cloud retrievals

These errors in cloud predictions can lead to up to 60 ppb of overestimation in hourly surface O-3 concentrations on some days. The average difference in summertime surface O-3 concentrations derived from the modeled clouds and satellite clouds ranges from 1 to 5 ppb for maximum daily 8 h average O-3 (MDA8 O-3) over the CONUS. This represents up to similar to 40% of the total MDA8 O-3 bias under cloudy conditions in the tested model version.

Surface O3 concentrations are sensitive to cloud errors mainly through the calculation of photolysis rates (for similar to 80 %), and to a lesser extent to light-dependent BVOC emissions. The sensitivity of surface O-3 concentrations to satellite-based cloud corrections is about 2 times larger in VOC-limited than NOx-limited regimes. Our results suggest that the benefits of accurate predictions of cloudiness would be significant in VOC-limited regions, which are typical of urban areas.