Data · collection · 2017
Supplementary material from "What makes specialized food-caching mountain chickadees successful city slickers?"
Listed in DataCite
Anthropogenic environments are a dominant feature of the modern world; therefore, understanding which traits allow animals to succeed in these urban environments is especially important.
Description
Overall, generalist species are thought to be most successful in urban environments, with better general cognition and less neophobia as suggested critical traits. It is less clear, however, which traits would be favoured in urban environments in highly specialized species.
Here, we compared highly specialized food-caching mountain chickadees living in an urban environment (Reno, NV, USA) with those living in their natural environment to investigate what makes this species successful in the city. Using a ‘common garden’ paradigm, we found that urban mountain chickadees tended to explore a novel environment faster and moved more frequently, were better at novel problem-solving, had better long-term spatial memory retention and had a larger telencephalon volume compared with forest chickadees.
Read the rest (2 more)
There were no significant differences between urban and forest chickadees in neophobia, food-caching rates, spatial memory acquisition, hippocampus volume or the total number of hippocampal neurons. Our results partially support the idea that some traits associated with behavioural flexibility and innovation are associated with successful establishment in urban environments, but differences in long-term spatial memory retention suggest that even this trait specialized for food-caching may be advantageous.
Our results highlight the importance of environmental context, species biology and temporal aspects of invasion in understanding how urban environments are associated with behavioural and cognitive phenotypes and suggest that there is likely no one suite of traits that makes urban animals successful.
Links
Where it is published
- Repository landing page figshare.com/collections/Supplementary_material_from_What_makes_specialized… ↗
landing page · from DataCite
- DOI doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3773288 ↗
DOI / persistent id · from DataCite
Documentation and papers
- CC BY creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 ↗
license · from DataCite
- IsSupplementTo 10.1098/rspb.2016.2613 doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2613 ↗
publication · from DataCite
Catalogue records · 2
- DataCite API api.datacite.org/dois/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3773288 ↗
metadata API · from DataCite
- DataCite Commons commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3773288 ↗
catalogue entry · from DataCite
Topics
- Stated by source
- Biological sciences · Psychology
Related
Provenance · 1 source records, 9 field assertions
| Source | Key | Last seen | Raw |
|---|---|---|---|
| DataCite | 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3773288 | 15 d ago | JSON v1 |
| Field | Assertion | Extractor | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| access_level | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | /data/attributes/rightsList |
| concepts[field].fos:biological-sciences | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].fos:psychology | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | |
| created_date | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | |
| description | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | /data/attributes/descriptions |
| license | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | /data/attributes/rightsList |
| publication_date | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | /data/attributes/dates |
| title | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 | /data/attributes/titles/0/title |
| updated_date | source · DataCite | connector:datacite@1.0.0 |